Anyone know where on the web I can get hold of the legend for the Jepp low
level enroute charts.

Unlike the NACO charts the Jepp charts don't have the legend on the charts.

Having used the NACO for the written, I wanted to evaluate the Jepps by
comparing them with the NACOs.

I have a couple of recent Jepp charts but no legend.

Thanks.

In article >,
"CB" > wrote:

> Anyone know where on the web I can get hold of the legend for the Jepp low
> level enroute charts.
>
> Unlike the NACO charts the Jepp charts don't have the legend on the charts.
>
> Having used the NACO for the written, I wanted to evaluate the Jepps by
> comparing them with the NACOs.
>
> I have a couple of recent Jepp charts but no legend.
>
> Thanks.

There's a page (or several?) in the front of the Jepp binder that serves
as the legend.

Im not sure that its available on the web. You get the legend provided
with your subscription when you subscribe. Maybe you can find someone
who has a subscription to compare with.

Dave

CB wrote:
> Anyone know where on the web I can get hold of the legend for the Jepp low
> level enroute charts.
>
> Unlike the NACO charts the Jepp charts don't have the legend on the charts.
>
> Having used the NACO for the written, I wanted to evaluate the Jepps by
> comparing them with the NACOs.
>
> I have a couple of recent Jepp charts but no legend.
>
> Thanks.
>
>

CB wrote:

> Anyone know where on the web I can get hold of the legend for the Jepp low
> level enroute charts.
>
> Unlike the NACO charts the Jepp charts don't have the legend on the charts.
>
> Having used the NACO for the written, I wanted to evaluate the Jepps by
> comparing them with the NACOs.
>
> I have a couple of recent Jepp charts but no legend.
>
> Thanks.

Jepp is a very propriatary bunch of folks, and getting more so almost by the
day. Forget them and use NACO unless you plan to fly international flights.
In that case, just buy the "full press" Jepp product and enjoy.

Jepp read = useful only if flying serious international.

wrote in :

> Jepp read = useful only if flying serious international.

Or if you're doing anything out of the ordinary. We use Jepp, because they
publish our approaches, which aren't public use. If you need anything non-
standard, Jepp is pretty much the only source there is. If you're just
flying spam cans from airport to airport, NACO may be fine, but Jepp does
that just as well, but if you're doing anything else, including but certainly
not limited to international, Jepp get the job done.

>>
We use Jepp, because they
publish our approaches, which aren't public use.
<<

If you have "your own" approach, why not just get THAT plate, use NACO for
everything else, and ensure that your approach hasn't been altered before each
flight?

Jose


--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)

"CB" > wrote in message
...
> Anyone know where on the web I can get hold of the legend for the Jepp low
> level enroute charts.
>
> Unlike the NACO charts the Jepp charts don't have the legend on the
charts.
>
> Having used the NACO for the written, I wanted to evaluate the Jepps by
> comparing them with the NACOs.
>
> I have a couple of recent Jepp charts but no legend.
>
> Thanks.
>
http://www.naco.faa.gov/index.asp?xml=naco/online/aero_guide

"Tom Sixkiller" > wrote in message
...
>
> "CB" > wrote in message
> ...
> > Anyone know where on the web I can get hold of the legend for the Jepp
low
> > level enroute charts.
> >
> > Unlike the NACO charts the Jepp charts don't have the legend on the
> charts.
> >
> > Having used the NACO for the written, I wanted to evaluate the Jepps by
> > comparing them with the NACOs.
> >
> > I have a couple of recent Jepp charts but no legend.
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> http://www.naco.faa.gov/index.asp?xml=naco/online/aero_guide

Whoops!

Stan Gosnell wrote:

> wrote in :
>
> > Jepp read = useful only if flying serious international.
>
> Or if you're doing anything out of the ordinary. We use Jepp, because they
> publish our approaches, which aren't public use. If you need anything non-
> standard, Jepp is pretty much the only source there is. If you're just
> flying spam cans from airport to airport, NACO may be fine, but Jepp does
> that just as well, but if you're doing anything else, including but certainly
> not limited to international, Jepp get the job done.

In the context of people who are concerned about chart costs, specials don't
normally come into play. ;-)

Since you're using specials, cost is probably way down the list. OTOH, if you're
Joe Pilot with a Cessna 182 you likely will never depart the 48 states, thus why
suffer Jeppesen's every-upward cost increases? Some folks got hit with 30%
increases in Jeppesen bills recently.

As to specials, some folks still use NACO for public and print their own specials
in-house. Not too difficult to do for specials.

Teacherjh wrote:

> >>
> We use Jepp, because they
> publish our approaches, which aren't public use.
> <<
>
> If you have "your own" approach, why not just get THAT plate, use NACO for
> everything else, and ensure that your approach hasn't been altered before each
> flight?

You don't have to worry about it changing. Because the FAA has to notify you will
new source documents for any change to a special. It is almost always an
amendment to your Operations Specifications.

Jeppesen would charge a King's Ransom to chart only a few specials for anyone.
And, you can't legally copy them; if you have need for 40 copies, you pay the
piper for each copy.

>>
Jeppesen would charge a King's Ransom to chart only a few specials for anyone.
And, you can't legally copy them; if you have need for 40 copies, you pay the
piper for each copy.
<<

If they're specials, chart 'em yourself. You already have [access to] all the
FAA stuff that goes into making the approach in the first place, no?

Jose

--
(for Email, make the obvious changes in my address)

Teacherjh wrote:

> >>
> Jeppesen would charge a King's Ransom to chart only a few specials for anyone.
> And, you can't legally copy them; if you have need for 40 copies, you pay the
> piper for each copy.
> <<
>
> If they're specials, chart 'em yourself. You already have [access to] all the
> FAA stuff that goes into making the approach in the first place, no?
>
> Jose

That's what I said!